Nonstandard relative clauses

I was browsing through the Wikipedia page on relative pronouns and I found this table:

Position With explicit relative pronoun With omitted relative pronoun In formal English
Subject That?s the man [who ran away]. ? That?s the man [who ran away].
Direct object That?s the man [who I saw yesterday]. That’s the man [I saw yesterday]. That?s the man [whom I saw yesterday].
Indirect object That?s the man [who I gave the letter to]. That?s the man [I gave the letter to]. That?s the man [to whom I gave the letter].
Oblique That?s the man [who I was talking about]. That?s the man [I was talking about]. That?s the man [about whom I was talking].
Genitive That?s the man [whose sister I know]. ? That?s the man [whose sister I know].
Obj of Comp That?s the man [who I am taller than]. That?s the man [I am taller than]. That?s the man [than whom I am taller].

The “in formal English” column is a bit odd because it only contrasts to the “with explicit relative pronoun.”? I’m guessing the middle column is supposed to be “informal,” but it doesn’t include nonstandard forms that can omit a subject relative pronoun, like “There was a farmer had a dog” (observed by Arnold Zwicky among others), or those that can omit a genitive relative pronoun, like “That’s the guy’s name I was trying to remember.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.