{"id":684,"date":"2015-09-04T01:55:15","date_gmt":"2015-09-04T05:55:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.grieve-smith.com\/blog1\/?p=684"},"modified":"2017-08-31T23:17:14","modified_gmt":"2017-09-01T03:17:14","slug":"trans-cis-and-the-default","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/2015\/09\/trans-cis-and-the-default\/","title":{"rendered":"Trans, cis and the default"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.grieve-smith.com\/blog\/2015\/07\/why-some-people-like-cisgender\/\">In a recent post<\/a>, I talked about one reason that the word &#8220;cisgender&#8221; was coined.  I agree that it is a good idea to have ways of talking about people who aren&#8217;t trans without evoking a context of &#8220;real&#8221; or &#8220;normal&#8221; to imply that we are not legitimate or to highlight our minority status.  If this were the case, something like &#8220;non-transgender men&#8221; might be enough.  But many of the arguments for &#8220;cis&#8221; go beyond this.<\/p>\n<p>The first step beyond simply using &#8220;cis&#8221; is asking non-trans people to &#8220;identify as cis.&#8221;  The idea is that trans women are marked as &#8220;not normal&#8221; just by virtue of having a word for ourselves, while non-trans women are the default &#8220;women.&#8221;  There are similar situations for women in general, for example in soccer:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/jaclynf\/status\/617835123317317632\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/jaclynf-soccer.png\" alt=\"@jaclynf After this game, everyone better start calling it ?soccer? and ?men?s soccer? #usausausa #USWNT\" width=\"475\" height=\"191\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-685\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Asking people to &#8220;identify as cis&#8221; &#8211; possibly as a condition of being accepted as an ally &#8211; means asking them to center trans people as the norm and mark themselves as deviating from that norm, at least in that context.<\/p>\n<p>Some people have gone beyond simply asking people to &#8220;identify as cis,&#8221; and made a point of criticizing the use of unmodified &#8220;woman&#8221; in contexts that do not apply to all (or any) trans women.  The idea is not just to make &#8220;trans&#8221; one acceptable default, but to exclude anything else from default status.<\/p>\n<p>These three linguistic goals &#8211; replacing words like &#8220;normal,&#8221; admitting &#8220;trans&#8221; as a possible default status, and removing default status from non-trans people &#8211; are all aimed at removing the stigma associated with transgender actions.  This stigma is real: I&#8217;ve received dirty looks and received petty harassment for wearing women&#8217;s clothes.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, I&#8217;m relatively fortunate.  I have never been attacked for being trans.  I have received unconditional love and support from my family, and found a reasonable amount of success in my work life and acceptance from my neighbors. Others have been fired, kicked out of their homes, beaten and even killed for &#8220;being a man&#8221; in a dress or in the women&#8217;s bathroom &#8211; or for *not* &#8220;being a man&#8221; enough in the family or the workplace.<\/p>\n<p>This stigma is not fair, and it needs to stop.  The question is whether a word like &#8220;cisgender&#8221; can confer default status on us, whether default status will actually help to stop it, and if so how much.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a recent post, I talked about one reason that the word &#8220;cisgender&#8221; was coined. I agree that it is a good idea to have ways of talking about people who aren&#8217;t trans without evoking a context of &#8220;real&#8221; or &#8220;normal&#8221; to imply that we are not legitimate or to highlight our minority status. If &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/2015\/09\/trans-cis-and-the-default\/\" class=\"excerpt-link\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[10,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-684","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-categorization","category-language-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/684","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=684"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/684\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1053,"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/684\/revisions\/1053"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=684"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=684"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grieve-smith.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=684"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}